If your jurisdiction typically restricts jury voir dire to the judge asking questions submitted by counsel, you may also distribute the jury panel between which channels?

In jurisdictions where jury voir dire is limited to the judge asking questions that have been submitted by counsel, the focus during this process often involves ensuring the jury selection is both efficient and fair. The concept of distributing the jury panel across different channels refers to how potential jurors may be engaged or assessed during this questioning process.

Choosing the channels effectively helps attorneys gauge jurors' biases and backgrounds based on the limited interaction permitted. The specific pair of channels identified in the chosen answer likely refers to methods that align well with the restrictions of the voir dire process and enable a thorough consideration of juror suitability without stepping outside the established legal parameters.

This strategic distribution also allows for different perspectives or attributes of the jurors to be highlighted appropriately, given the constraints imposed by the court. Thus, selecting channels that complement the court's intent ensures that jurors are examined thoroughly while remaining compliant with judicial guidelines.

The other options may not align well with the typical procedures or may involve combinations that do not provide an effective assessment of juror qualifications under the specified restrictions. Therefore, the chosen answer optimally respects the structure of voir dire as dictated by the court while maximizing the effectiveness of juror evaluation.