Instead of taking an oath, what can individuals with philosophical objections choose to do?

Individuals with philosophical objections may choose to affirm instead of taking an oath. This alternative allows them to make a solemn declaration of truthfulness without invoking a deity or religious text, which often conflicts with their beliefs. The affirmation serves the same legal purpose as an oath by ensuring that the individual's testimony is made under penalty of perjury, emphasizing their commitment to telling the truth based on personal or philosophical convictions rather than religious ones.

By choosing to affirm, these individuals uphold the integrity of the legal process while remaining true to their ethical or philosophical principles. This option recognizes and accommodates diverse beliefs within the legal system. In many jurisdictions, affirmations are legally accepted in lieu of oaths, further reinforcing the principle that justice serves all individuals, regardless of their personal beliefs.