What must an attorney do to successfully challenge a juror 'for cause'?

To successfully challenge a juror "for cause," an attorney must explain the reasoning to the court. This involves articulating the specific biases or conflicts of interest that may prevent the juror from being impartial in the case at hand. The challenge must be based on valid legal grounds, such as a demonstrated lack of ability to follow the law impartially due to previous experiences or preconceived notions about the case or parties involved.

By providing a clear and cogent rationale, the attorney helps the court understand why the juror may not be suitable for the jury. This is crucial, as the court requires detailed justification to grant a for cause challenge and dismiss a juror. Simply stating the juror's name, referencing personal opinions, or presenting a witness does not fulfill the requirement for a proper challenge; legal arguments and reasoning must be presented to persuade the judge effectively.