Which factor is NOT typically monitored during troubleshooting sessions?

During troubleshooting sessions, it is important to focus on technical factors that can impact the performance and reliability of recording equipment. The correct option is based on the fact that command responses from the judge are not a technical indicator of equipment function; rather, they pertain more to the courtroom interactions and the legal proceedings happening.

In contrast, the other listed factors play crucial roles in ensuring that the digital reporting equipment operates effectively. Indicators of channel activity show whether audio is being captured, allowing troubleshooting for recording issues. Audio clarity and fidelity are vital aspects to monitor, ensuring that the captured audio is intelligible and meets quality standards. Equipment connectivity status is essential to verify that all devices are properly connected and functioning, which could either mitigate or cause issues during a session.

Overall, while command responses are important for courtroom management, they do not reflect any technical status or functionality of the recording equipment being monitored during troubleshooting.