Which of the following is NOT a role of jurors in a courtroom?

Jurors play a crucial role in the courtroom by engaging in various responsibilities that are foundational to the judicial process. One of their primary functions is to deliberate facts, meaning they discuss and analyze the evidence presented during the trial to understand the case thoroughly. Their deliberation allows them to evaluate the evidence critically, assessing its credibility and relevance to reach informed conclusions about the case.

Another significant role is rendering verdicts. After deliberation, jurors collectively decide whether the evidence supports a guilty or not guilty verdict in criminal cases, or a liable or not liable decision in civil cases. This decision-making process is vital as it translates the jury's assessment of the case into a formal legal conclusion.

However, instructing the judge is not a role that jurors fulfill. Jurors listen to the judge's instructions on the law and apply those instructions as they deliberate on the facts of the case. The judge has the responsibility to provide legal guidance, and this is distinct from the juror's role, which focuses on evaluating the case presented to them. Therefore, the option regarding instructing the judge is identified as the correct answer, as it does not align with the established functions of jurors in a trial.