Which two people should not be on the same channel?

In a legal setting, an interpreter plays a crucial role in facilitating communication between a witness and the court. If a witness and an interpreter are placed on the same channel, it could create conflicts, misunderstandings, or biases in the communication process. The interpreter's job is to convey information accurately and impartially, without influence from the witness's statements or reactions.

By keeping the interpreter separate from the same channel as the witness, it ensures that the interpreter can perform their role effectively, translating the witness's speech to the court while maintaining the necessary neutrality and objectivity. This separation upholds the integrity of the judicial process and helps guarantee that all parties understand the testimony being presented without skewed perception from either side.

In contrast, other options involve roles that might reasonably be on the same channel without compromising communication integrity or impartiality. For example, a judge and a clerk often communicate on the same channel as part of court proceedings, and counsel may need to discuss matters directly with a witness under certain conditions.